Hi,
maybe you remember that I asked you for helping with dynaflex.? I uploaded the current manual and the current dev version of dynaflex, and asked if it's usable with the current manual.
Hm... After some days of waiting, I got not a single answer!
Now I ask myself if no developers reading this blog (and know that there are some devs out there ;-) ). If none is interested in dynaflex, and if it is so, why? Is the manual perfect in the status it is right now? Or is absolutely not understandable?
It would be OK if I got only comments like "this is sh..." or "make it new". No problem, but nothing? That's really demotivating...
Anyhow, I'm still working on the next release and I hope that there will be some reactions from soneone. ;-)
Greets,
Thomas
Thanks, Thomas. This is a big help. Some folks might need to know that when they are setting up the ...
Hi, @Andreas: I'm sure there is a solution to start Firefox directly with a profile. Even on OS ...
On Mac there's an even simpler solution: http://codecontortionist.com/software/mac-osx-software/...
Thanks a lot for your article. I'am working with linux and till now I run firefox under a different...
Hi Jonas, you have to be logged in. Open the issue you want to tag. At the end of the description, ...